FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 460M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 460M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 460M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 340% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1528 GB more memory, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 526 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 571% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 666% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 357% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Hawaii | N11E-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 16.1 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 33 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |