FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
When choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 46% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 224 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−105 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Hawaii | N13E-GR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 5080 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 2x 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 370
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Radeon R9 370
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Radeon Pro Vega 16