FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 675M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 2x 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 10900% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 204 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Hawaii | N12E-GTX2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 620 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |