FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 680M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 680M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 680M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 120% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 680M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 104 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 680M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Hawaii | N13E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 4 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 80.6 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 100 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M