FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 775M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 775M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 775M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 775M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 775M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 775M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 775M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 120% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 775M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 775M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 105 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 775M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 775M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 775M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 775M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 775M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 775M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Hawaii | N13E-GTX-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 24 September 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 3540 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |