FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 860M
When comparing FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 860M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 860M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 193% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 860M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 27 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 860M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Hawaii | N15P-GX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 797 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 163 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce GTX 860M vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon Pro 555X
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon Pro 555X