FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 880M
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 880M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 880M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 80% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 880M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 880M have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 880M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 880M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 130 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 880M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Hawaii | N15E-GX-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 954 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 127.1 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 96 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce GTX 880M vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 780M
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q