FirePro W8100 vs GeForce MX150
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and GeForce MX150. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce MX150. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 2100% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 644 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 1008 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 148% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 123% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce MX150. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Hawaii | N17S-G1 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce MX150 vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Iris Graphics 540
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000