FirePro W8100 vs GeForce MX450
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and GeForce MX450. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce MX450. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | GeForce MX450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 340% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 571 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 5002 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 103% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W8100 and GeForce MX450 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W8100 and GeForce MX450 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | GeForce MX450 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Hawaii | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 100.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 10002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |