FirePro W8100 vs Iris Graphics 540
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Iris Graphics 540 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 540 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 MB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 1366% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 56 GB more memory, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 524 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 209% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 174% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | Hawaii | Skylake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |