FirePro W8100 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W8100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 97% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Hawaii | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P2000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000