FirePro W8100 vs NVS 510

In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and NVS 510 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others NVS 510 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W8100

NVS 510 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W8100	NVS 510
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI	4x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro W8100 has 528% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and NVS 510 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and NVS 510 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 27 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
FirePro W8100 and NVS 510 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro W8100 is 119 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	0−1
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	1−2
medium / 1080p	40−45	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	0−1
medium / 1080p	60−65	−
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W8100 and NVS 510 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	60−65
medium / 768p	220−230	27−30
ultra / 1080p	180−190	7−8
QHD / 1440p	110−120	−
4K / 2160p	70−75	−
high / 768p	210−220	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	0−1
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
FirePro W8100 and NVS 510 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	45−50
medium / 768p	110−120	10−11
ultra / 1080p	100−110	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	45−50	−
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	−
low / 720p	80−85	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	−
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	21−24
medium / 1080p	110−120	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 740% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	60−65	0−1
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	0−1
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	0−1
medium / 1080p	65−70	0−1
low / 768p	140−150	18−20
medium / 768p	130−140	−
high / 1080p	70−75	0−1
ultra / 1080p	30−35	−
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	65−70	0−1
medium / 1080p	30−35	−
low / 768p	130−140	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 75% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 720p	100−110	8−9
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	0−1
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
low / 768p	130−140	0−1
medium / 768p	85−90	−
high / 1080p	45−50	−
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
4K / 2160p	16−18	−
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	50−55	0−1
high / 768p	60−65	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	FirePro W8100	NVS 510
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Code name	Hawaii	GK107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2014	23 October 2012
Pipelines	2560	192
Core clock speed	824 MHz	797 MHz
Transistor count	6,200 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	131.8	12.75
Floating-point performance	4,219 gflops	306.0 gflops
Length	279 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	512 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	466 Mh/s	17 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro W8100 vs NVS 510

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares