FirePro W8100 vs Quadro 4000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W8100 and Quadro 4000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W8100 stacks up against Quadro 4000M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Quadro 4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 120% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 349 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 590% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro 4000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Quadro 4000M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Hawaii | Fermi |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 475 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 26.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 82 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |