FirePro W8100 vs Quadro 5010M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Quadro 5010M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Quadro 5010M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 120% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 374 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3700 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 191% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 152% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Hawaii | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |