FirePro W8100 vs Quadro CX
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Quadro CX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro CX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- FirePro W8100 has 46% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1528 GB more memory, than FirePro W8100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 222 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- FirePro W8100 is 12 mm longer, than Quadro CX.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 942% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro W8100 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Hawaii | GT200B |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Quadro CX vs Quadro P2000
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GT 645M
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics