FirePro W8100 vs Radeon Pro 450
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Radeon Pro 450. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon Pro 450. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 528% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 24 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 80 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 107% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Hawaii | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 127 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |