FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
When choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R7 Carrizo, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R7 Carrizo.
FirePro W8100
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 1733% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R7 Carrizo are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 571% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 666% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 192% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 383% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | Hawaii | Carrizo |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 4 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2410 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |