FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R7 M275DX
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R7 M275DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M275DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
Radeon R7 M275DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M275DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M275DX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M275DX - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M275DX - with GCN.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R7 M275DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M275DX. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Hawaii | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 4 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |