FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 M280X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M280X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M280X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M280X is 76 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M280X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 666% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 411% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 471% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Hawaii | Saturn XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | Not Listed |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |