FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 M290X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M290X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M290X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
Radeon R9 M290X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M290X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M290X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 120% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M290X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M290X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M290X is 26 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M290X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3800 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 113% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M290X | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Hawaii | Neptune |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 300 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |