FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 M365X
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 76 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 360% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 231% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | Hawaii | Tropo |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Quadro P2000
- Radeon R9 M365X vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Iris Graphics 6100
- FirePro W8100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Graphics 6100
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870