FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 M385
When choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M385, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M385.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M385 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 161% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 134% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R9 M385. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | Hawaii | Strato |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 56.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Quadro P2000
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce 945M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce 945M