FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX 540
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Radeon RX 540. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon RX 540. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
Radeon RX 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 540 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 238% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 540.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 540.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 540 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 540 - with Polaris.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 540 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 161% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 107% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX 540. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon RX 540 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Hawaii | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |