FirePro W8100 vs UHD Graphics 617
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and UHD Graphics 617 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 617 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
UHD Graphics 617 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 617 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 617 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | UHD Graphics 617 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 1366% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 617.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 617 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 617 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 617 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 524 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 617.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 617 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 527% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 335% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than UHD Graphics 617. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than UHD Graphics 617. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | UHD Graphics 617 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
Code name | Hawaii | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 30 October 2018 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 25.20 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- UHD Graphics 617 vs Quadro P2000
- UHD Graphics 617 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon HD 7750M
- UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
- UHD Graphics 617 vs Radeon HD 7750M