FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 560M
When comparing FirePro W9000 and GeForce GTX 560M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W9000 and GeForce GTX 560M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W9000
GeForce GTX 560M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
1536 MB
Display Connectors
6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W9000 has 366% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
FirePro W9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 560M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 560M has 1530 GB more memory, than FirePro W9000.
FirePro W9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 560M - in Laptops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 560M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
FirePro W9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 560M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 4250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
4−5
ultra / 1080p
21−24
2−3
QHD / 1440p
16−18
1−2
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
14−16
medium / 1080p
40−45
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
55−60
10−11
ultra / 1080p
45−50
8−9
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
21−24
medium / 1080p
60−65
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
250−260
130−140
medium / 768p
220−230
100−110
ultra / 1080p
180−190
50−55
QHD / 1440p
110−120
24−27
4K / 2160p
70−75
12−14
high / 768p
210−220
75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
120−130
80−85
medium / 768p
110−120
55−60
ultra / 1080p
100−110
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
45−50
7−8
ultra / 1080p
40−45
5−6
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
5−6
low / 720p
80−85
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
60−65
7−8
ultra / 1080p
45−50
0−1
QHD / 1440p
27−30
0−1
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
55−60
medium / 1080p
110−120
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 328% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
60−65
10−11
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
−
4K / 2160p
24−27
8−9
low / 720p
100−110
21−24
medium / 1080p
65−70
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
140−150
50−55
medium / 768p
120−130
−
high / 1080p
70−75
10−12
ultra / 1080p
30−35
5−6
QHD / 1440p
21−24
−
medium / 720p
−
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
24−27
3−4
ultra / 1080p
20−22
1−2
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
10−11
medium / 1080p
30−35
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
130−140
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
10−11
medium / 1080p
35−40
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
130−140
20−22
medium / 768p
85−90
12−14
high / 1080p
45−50
6−7
ultra / 1080p
24−27
4−5
4K / 2160p
16−18
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
50−55
18−20
high / 768p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Full Specs
FirePro W9000
GeForce GTX 560M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Code name
Tahiti
N12E-GS
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
14 June 2012
30 May 2011
Pipelines
2048
192
Core clock speed
975 MHz
775 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
124.8
24.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
3,994 gflops
595.2 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
460 Mh/s
44 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price