FirePro W9000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W9000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W9000 stacks up against Iris Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W9000
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
Display Connectors
6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W9000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro W9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
9−10
QHD / 1440p
16−18
3−4
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
40−45
20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
55−60
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
5−6
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 129% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W9000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
180−190
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
55−60
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−33
high / 768p
210−220
140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
FirePro W9000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
95−100
ultra / 1080p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
45−50
18−20
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
60−65
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
20−22
QHD / 1440p
27−30
12−14
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 97% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
9−10
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
QHD / 1440p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
130−140
55−60
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
20−22
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
Full Specs
FirePro W9000
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Tahiti
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
14 June 2012
15 August 2020
Pipelines
2048
96
Core clock speed
975 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
124.8
Floating-point performance
3,994 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
460 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
