FirePro W9000 vs Quadro CX

When choosing between FirePro W9000 and Quadro CX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W9000 and Quadro CX.

FirePro W9000 Check Price

Quadro CX

Main Specs

	FirePro W9000	Quadro CX
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1536 MB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
	Check Price

FirePro W9000 has 133% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
FirePro W9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro CX has 1530 GB more memory, than FirePro W9000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 373 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
FirePro W9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
FirePro W9000 is 12 mm longer, than Quadro CX.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 3900 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	1−2
ultra / 1080p	21−24	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	10−12
medium / 1080p	40−45	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	3−4
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	12−14
medium / 1080p	60−65	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W9000 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	110−120
medium / 768p	220−230	85−90
ultra / 1080p	180−190	35−40
QHD / 1440p	110−120	−
4K / 2160p	70−75	10−11
high / 768p	210−220	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
FirePro W9000 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	110−120	45−50
ultra / 1080p	100−110	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	40−45	2−3
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	0−1
low / 720p	80−85	10−11
medium / 1080p	45−50	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	27−30	1−2
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	45−50
medium / 1080p	110−120	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	60−65	3−4
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	0−1
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	14−16
medium / 1080p	65−70	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	140−150	40−45
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	3−4
ultra / 1080p	30−35	2−3
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	1−2
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	3−4
medium / 1080p	30−35	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	130−140	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	4−5
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	130−140	8−9
medium / 768p	85−90	7−8
high / 1080p	45−50	3−4
ultra / 1080p	24−27	3−4
4K / 2160p	16−18	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro CX.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	50−55	12−14
high / 768p	60−65	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro CX.

Full Specs

	FirePro W9000	Quadro CX
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	11 November 2008
Pipelines	2048	192
Core clock speed	975 MHz	602 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	124.8	38.53
Floating-point performance	3,994 gflops	462.3 gflops
Length	279 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		1.3
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	460 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro W9000 vs Quadro CX

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares