FirePro W9000 vs Quadro FX 3800

When comparing FirePro W9000 and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W9000 and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W9000 Check Price

Quadro FX 3800

Main Specs

	FirePro W9000	Quadro FX 3800
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price

FirePro W9000 has 224% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
FirePro W9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W9000 has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
FirePro W9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
FirePro W9000 is 81 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 3900 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	0−1
ultra / 1080p	21−24	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	10−11
medium / 1080p	40−45	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	2−3
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	9−10
medium / 1080p	60−65	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W9000 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	100−110
medium / 768p	220−230	75−80
ultra / 1080p	180−190	30−35
QHD / 1440p	110−120	−
4K / 2160p	70−75	9−10
high / 768p	210−220	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
FirePro W9000 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	65−70
medium / 768p	110−120	40−45
ultra / 1080p	100−110	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	45−50	1−2
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	0−1
low / 720p	80−85	7−8
medium / 1080p	45−50	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1866% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	27−30	0−1
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	40−45
medium / 1080p	110−120	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	60−65	1−2
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	0−1
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	12−14
medium / 1080p	65−70	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	140−150	35−40
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	1−2
ultra / 1080p	30−35	−
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	24−27	0−1
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	1−2
medium / 1080p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	130−140	85−90
high / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	2−3
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3250% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	130−140	4−5
medium / 768p	85−90	−
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
4K / 2160p	16−18	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	90−95	65−70
medium / 768p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	50−55	10−12
high / 768p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	FirePro W9000	Quadro FX 3800
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	30 March 2009
Pipelines	2048	192
Core clock speed	975 MHz	600 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	124.8	38.40
Floating-point performance	3,994 gflops	462.3 gflops
Length	279 mm	198 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	51.2 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		1.3
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	460 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro W9000 vs Quadro FX 3800

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares