FirePro W9000 vs Quadro K4200

When comparing FirePro W9000 and Quadro K4200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W9000 and Quadro K4200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W9000 Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W9000	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W9000 has 224% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro W9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 204 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro W9000 and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro W9000 is 38 mm longer, than Quadro K4200.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	16−18	7−8
4K / 2160p	10−11	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	40−45
medium / 1080p	40−45	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	30−33
QHD / 1440p	35−40	14−16
4K / 2160p	18−20	9−10
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W9000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	230−240
medium / 768p	220−230	200−210
ultra / 1080p	180−190	120−130
QHD / 1440p	110−120	100−105
4K / 2160p	70−75	55−60
high / 768p	210−220	170−180
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro W9000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	45−50	27−30
ultra / 1080p	40−45	24−27
QHD / 1440p	27−30	20−22
4K / 2160p	14−16	8−9
low / 720p	80−85	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	27−30	16−18
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	30−35	16−18
4K / 2160p	24−27	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	65−70	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	140−150	100−110
medium / 768p	120−130	95−100
high / 1080p	70−75	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	18−20
QHD / 1440p	21−24	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−12
QHD / 1440p	16−18	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	3−4
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K4200.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−12
QHD / 1440p	10−11	2−3
4K / 2160p	7−8	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	130−140	80−85
medium / 768p	85−90	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
4K / 2160p	16−18	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 67% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K4200.

Full Specs

	FirePro W9000	Quadro K4200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	2048	1344
Core clock speed	975 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	124.8	87.81
Floating-point performance	3,994 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	279 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	460 Mh/s	119 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W9000 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares