FirePro W9000 vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
FirePro W9000
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
1x DVI
Check Price
FirePro W9000 has 47% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro W9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W9000 has 3 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 401 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro W9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro W9000 is 31 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 2500 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
24−27
QHD / 1440p
35−40
8−9
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
220−230
medium / 768p
220−230
190−200
ultra / 1080p
180−190
110−120
QHD / 1440p
110−120
70−75
4K / 2160p
70−75
35−40
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
40−45
20−22
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
7−8
low / 720p
80−85
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
27−30
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
60−65
30−35
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−12
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
65−70
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
140−150
95−100
medium / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
70−75
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
QHD / 1440p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
20−22
9−10
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
2−3
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
130−140
65−70
medium / 768p
85−90
40−45
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2050.
Full Specs
FirePro W9000
Tesla C2050
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Code name
Tahiti
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
14 June 2012
25 July 2011
Pipelines
2048
448
Core clock speed
975 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
124.8
32.14
Floating-point performance
3,994 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
279 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
144.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
460 Mh/s
90 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
