FirePro M6100 vs FireStream 9250
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6100 and FireStream 9250, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6100 stacks up against FireStream 9250, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9250 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and FireStream 9250 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M6100 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and FireStream 9250 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9250 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 475 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FirePro M6100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9250 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 4014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Battlefield 5 is 144% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Fortnite is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | FireStream 9250 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Bonaire | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 16 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,000.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1986 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 63.55 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |