FirePro S10000 vs FireStream 9250
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and FireStream 9250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others FireStream 9250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
FireStream 9250
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | FireStream 9250 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- FirePro S10000 has 400% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FireStream 9250 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 5 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FireStream 9250 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 200 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9250 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and FireStream 9250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro S10000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 411% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 295% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | FireStream 9250 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | RV770 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 16 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1986 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 63.55 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |