FireStream 9250 vs FireStream 9270
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and FireStream 9270, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9250
FireStream 9270
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DVI |
- FireStream 9270 has 6% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9270 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 and FireStream 9270 are build with TeraScale architecture.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 125 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 and FireStream 9270 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1614 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and FireStream 9270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 7% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| FireStream 9250 and FireStream 9270 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
| Code name | RV770 | RV770 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 13 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 30.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |