FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 720A
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce 720A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and GeForce 720A.
FireStream 9250
GeForce 720A
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce 720A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9250 has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 720A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce 720A have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce 720A - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 720A is 150 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce 720A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 720A is 14 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 720A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce 720A | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | GF117 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 938 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 15.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 360.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |