FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 930MX
When comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce 930MX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce 930MX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
GeForce 930MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930MX here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce 930MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 17 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 782% more power consumption, than GeForce 930MX.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 930MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 930MX has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 930MX - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce 930MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930MX is 327 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce 930MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 930MX is 14 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce 930MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Fortnite is 7% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce 930MX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce 930MX | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | N16S-GMR |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 10 March 2016 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 952 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 24.48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 783.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |