FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 645M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 645M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against GeForce GT 645M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 368% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 645M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 645M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 645M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 645M - with Kepler.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 645M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 186 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 26% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 645M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N13P-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 22.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 544.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GT 650M
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- FireStream 9250 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX