FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 730M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 730M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 730M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GT 730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 730M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 730M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 730M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 730M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 730M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 100 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 730M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 186 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 730M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 26% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 730M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 730M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 January 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 23.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 552.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1800 - 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |