FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 750M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 750M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against GeForce GT 750M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 750M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 750M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 750M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 342 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 14 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 750M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | N14P-GT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 April 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 30.94 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 64.19 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |