FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 750M SLI
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 750M SLI, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against GeForce GT 750M SLI, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 750M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 750M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 750M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 750M SLI - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 342 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 750M SLI - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 14 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Fortnite is 147% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 750M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14P-GT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 April 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 967 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1300 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |