FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 755M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 755M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GT 755M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 755M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 755M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 755M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 755M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 755M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 355 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 755M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 3414 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Dota 2 is 19% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Fortnite is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Forza Horizon 4 is 54% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GT 755M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | N14P- |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 25 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 31.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |