FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
When comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 75 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 1036 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 8% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale | G9x |
Code name | RV770 | NB9E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 800 | 224 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |