FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 295
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 295. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 295. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 92% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1791 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 617 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 295 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 987 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |