FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 860M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 860M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 860M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 860M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 172 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 860M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 288% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 340% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 170% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
Code name | RV770 | N15P-GX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 797 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |