FireStream 9250 vs GeForce MX130
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce MX130. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce MX130. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce MX130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce MX130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX130.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX130 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX130 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX130 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce MX130 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 497 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX130 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 3026 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Fortnite is 61% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Forza Horizon 4 is 81% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce MX130 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | N16S-GTR |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 January 2018 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1122 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 29.81 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |