FireStream 9250 vs GeForce MX150
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce MX150, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against GeForce MX150, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 843 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4022 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 177% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 95% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 127% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Pascal |
Code name | RV770 | N17S-G1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GT 650M
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Iris Graphics 540
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000