FireStream 9250 vs GRID K140Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GRID K140Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GRID K140Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GRID K140Q
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9250 has 15% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K140Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9250 and GRID K140Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 225 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 204 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 50% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |