FireStream 9250 vs GRID K220Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and GRID K220Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against GRID K220Q, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GRID K220Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- GRID K220Q has 50% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 511 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 120 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 26% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9250 and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GRID K220Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | GK104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |