FireStream 9250 vs GRID M6 8Q

When choosing between FireStream 9250 and GRID M6 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and GRID M6 8Q.

FireStream 9250

GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9250	GRID M6 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M6 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 97 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 3026 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	5−6	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	7−8	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	18−20	60−65
medium / 1080p	7−8	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9250 and GRID M6 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	95−100	190−200
ultra / 1080p	45−50	110−120
QHD / 1440p	35−40	75−80
4K / 2160p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	70−75	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 106% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	100−110
ultra / 1080p	27−30	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 90% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	3−4	21−24
ultra / 1080p	3−4	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	12−14	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	10−12	27−30
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	14−16	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 188% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	8−9	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	20−22	60−65
medium / 1080p	10−11	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 254% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	8−9	35−40
ultra / 1080p	3−4	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	7−8	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	75−80	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	7−8	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	16−18	65−70
medium / 768p	12−14	40−45
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9250	GRID M6 8Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	RV770	GM204
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	30 August 2015
Pipelines	800	1536
Core clock speed	625 MHz	722 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	25.00	69.31
Floating-point performance	1,000.0 gflops	2,218 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1986 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FireStream 9250 vs GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares