FireStream 9250 vs GRID M60 1Q

In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and GRID M60 1Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 1Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FireStream 9250

GRID M60 1Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9250	GRID M60 1Q
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

GRID M60 1Q has 50% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FireStream 9250 and GRID M60 1Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M60 1Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 3026 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	5−6	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	7−8	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	30−33
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	18−20	70−75
medium / 1080p	7−8	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9250 and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	95−100	200−210
ultra / 1080p	45−50	120−130
QHD / 1440p	35−40	100−105
4K / 2160p	18−20	55−60
high / 768p	70−75	170−180
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	110−120
ultra / 1080p	27−30	80−85
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 105% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	3−4	27−30
ultra / 1080p	3−4	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	55−60
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	10−12	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	14−16	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 247% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	8−9	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	20−22	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−11	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	8−9	40−45
ultra / 1080p	3−4	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 161% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	7−8	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	75−80	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	7−8	40−45
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	16−18	80−85
medium / 768p	12−14	50−55
high / 1080p	6−7	27−30
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 362% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9250	GRID M60 1Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	RV770	GM204
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	30 August 2015
Pipelines	800	2048
Core clock speed	625 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	25.00	150.8
Floating-point performance	1,000.0 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1986 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FireStream 9250 vs GRID M60 1Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares