FireStream 9250 vs HD Graphics 5000
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and HD Graphics 5000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and HD Graphics 5000.
FireStream 9250
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5000 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5000 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and HD Graphics 5000 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 425 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5000 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 26% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 10% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than HD Graphics 5000. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | RV770 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 44.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |